Click here for the home page 

The Xenophile Historian





THE HOLY BOOK OF UNIVERSAL TRUTHS,
K. U. P.


(Kimball's Unauthorized Perversion)





Time For A New Manhattan Project



Who is financing terrorism and the spread of militant Islam around the world? If you drive a car, van, truck or motorcycle, you do! Every time you go and fill up your gas tank, the money you spend eventually ends up in the hands of an oil-producing country, and if that country is a member of OPEC, they will send part of it to their fighters (Moslem missionaries as well as terrorists) in the War on Terror. I don't know about you, but the thought of being an unwitting accomplice to Islamofascism burns me up.

In pre-capitalist societies, wealth was measured in the amount of land, livestock or workers somebody owned. Then with the arrival of capitalism, one's wealth was measured in the amount of precious metals and gems owned, or their equivalent value in paper certificates/banknotes. We still follow that system, even without the gold standard, but since the invention of the internal combustion engine, a more accurate measure of wealth might be how much energy one has access to. I say that because nothing can reduce modern man's standard of living as quickly as the loss of available energy. If you don't believe me, remember the last time you were in a power blackout that lasted more than an hour, and how you looked forward to its end. Indeed, some futurologists have suggested that tomorrow's economy will be based on an energy standard. And while we can (and should) make more efficient use of the energy we're already consuming, I still expect total energy consumption to keep going up; try as I might, I'm still using more electricity than I did at this time last year, presumably because of all the electronic gadgets we now depend on.

The economy of the world's most advanced countries has been powered by petroleum since (roughly) 1900. For more than half of the twentieth century, the cost of that petroleum was relatively cheap, and only in wartime did we worry about a shortage. Therefore, the price of oil was not a factor in economic ups and downs. The companies that brought energy to us became filthy rich (John D. Rockefeller was sometimes accused of being the real owner of the United States), but we had no fears that they would try to destroy Western civilization; after all, if they did destroy it, they would starve, too! Then the world's main oil production center shifted from Texas to the Middle East, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) was formed, and the price of crude oil began to rise.

As long as foreign (mostly American and British) companies controlled the oil wells of the Third World, they paid as little as possible to the host countries for the privilege of extracting the oil. Therefore you could say that the price increases of the early 1970s were only fair; it was time for the people living on and near the oilfields to get a piece of the economic pie. If all the OPEC countries did was make a profit, we wouldn't have much reason to complain. The problem was that they also quickly learned they could use that oil as a weapon, to force the developed countries to submit to their interests. We first saw this in the aftermath of the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, when OPEC stopped selling oil to the United States and the Netherlands for six months, causing the first of two serious energy crises in that decade. The second crisis came with the Iranian Revolution of 1979; Iran at that time only supplied the United States with 3 percent of the oil it needed, but losing access to those wells and refineries caused a 100 percent shortage! On top of all that, the Arabs, especially the Saudis, used their new-found wealth to buy the West bit by bit, from various choice pieces of real estate, to a chunk of FOX News stock, to the unsuccessful 2006 Dubai ports deal.

Today it seems that oilfields are a bad influence on the countries that have them. OPEC is a front organization for terrorism; most of the countries that give money to terrorists are OPEC members, and they get that money from their oil industries. Look at who belongs to OPEC: Algeria, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela. Alas, most of them are corrupt and undemocratic, and all of them are Moslem except Venezuela. For a while I preferred filling up the family cars at gas stations that carried Citgo gas, because Citgo gets it from Venezuela instead of the Persian Gulf. Then Hugo Chavez became a real S.O.B., so now the only OPEC country I can buy from (and not feel guilty about it) is post-Baathist Iraq.

(By the way, for those who think the war in Iraq is only about oil, I would ask: if oil is the issue, why didn't we go into Venezuela, which is a lot closer and also has an annoying head of state? And why didn't the price of gas go down after the Iraqi pipelines started carrying the "black gold" again? Never mind missing weapons of mass destruction, it looks like we didn't find any oil in Iraq! If President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and their friends at Halliburton really had that much control over the price of gas, don't you think they'd keep it below $1.25 a gallon, and thereby perpetuate the Republican Party's hold on the US government? In February 1999, I could get gas for as little as 86 a gallon, and then-president Clinton was riding high in the polls, even though Congress had impeached him. Coincidence?)

What all this means is that if we're serious about winning the War on Terror, we'd better find another source for our energy needs, a non-OPEC one. Look at past examples: would we have been able to win World War II, if a vital resource like coal, steel or oil came to us from the Axis? Indeed, many Europeans had second thoughts about opposing communism, when the Soviet Union built a natural gas pipeline to West Germany. This may be the first war that a country tried to win, while financing both sides!

3 OPEC heads of state
Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, and Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah. Who really wants to buy gas from these guys?


The Department of Energy was created to manage America's energy supply, during the Carter presidency. However, it has been a useless government agency; everyone in Washington seems to have their own goals regarding energy production and consumption, with the result being that they cancel each other out, and the Department of Energy does nothing. So how do we get things moving? It looks like it will take an all-out commitment on our part to achieve the goal; call it a new "Manhattan Project" if you wish.

Neil Tyson, an astronomer and director of the Hayden Planetarium, looked at what would encourage our country to explore space. Learning abstract knowledge is not enough; we launched astronauts and space probes for that reason in the 1960s, but once we reached the moon, the public got bored with the space program, and called it a waste of money. Tyson concluded that only three motivations are strong enough to keep people working on a major project until they finish it: the need for defense, a promise that the project will make money, and what he called "praise of power," which means the project will pump up the ego of the builder. Here are eleven great projects or "wonders" of the past, with the motivations behind them:

Funding Challenges

Motivations for Major Projects -- Three Drivers

Project Why It Was Built
Great Wall of China Defense
Manhattan Project Defense
Interstate Highway System Defense
Apollo Program (the space race) Defense
Voyages of Columbus Promise of Economic Return
Magellan's Expedition Promise of Economic Return
Tennessee Valley Authority Promise of Economic Return
Pyramids Praise of Power
Vatican Praise of Power
Versailles Praise of Power
Taj Mahal Praise of Power

Source:  http://www.chicagospace.org/tyson_space.html

The "praise of power" motivator may have worked for pharaohs and popes, but nowadays only totalitarian dictators can get away with it. Therefore an energy independence project will have to be driven by defense concerns, or the promise of riches for those that do it--preferably both.

Remember what I said about conflicting energy policies? Conservatives want to increase the available energy supply, while liberals prefer solutions that promote conservation and reduce pollution. To wean ourselves from OPEC, I think we're going to have to try as many of them as possible, and stop bickering over which solution is the best. Therefore I propose that the energy "Manhattan Project" should include all of the following:

Offshore oil rig & gas pump


I've already heard a few naysayers say that developing new sources of energy can't be done, and that the West will always be dependent on OPEC. At least one of them is a sympathizer for the other side, so I know he has an interest in seeing our defeat. Well, we're not going to know if we can do it until we try. Furthermore, I pointed out in my "Islamic Reformation" essay that the Moslem world no longer has the mindset to conduct scientific research; they probably figure that if the Koran does not offer a solution to a modern-day problem, like fuel shortages, it is against the will of Allah to look for one. If there are new sources of energy out there, which civilization do you honestly think is in a better position to find them?


Islamic vs. Kafir Civilization

(Picture from Omdurman.org.)


Once we have energy independence, Islamofascism will wither away, because when we do not buy oil from the countries that support it, we will cut off its life support system. Every advantage in the War on Terror will then be with us; our enemy cannot make the modern weapons he uses against us, and without money, he will no longer be able to buy them. And maybe after completing a long-term project like this one, we will have gained the determination we need to see the war to its conclusion; currently that's the other side's main advantage. If Islamofascism survives, it will be an ideology that only attracts losers, like Neo-Nazi movements and the form of communism still promoted on college campuses. The rest of the world will say "let them eat sand," as Cal Thomas recently put it, leave them behind, and move on to do other things, like develop a cure for cancer or build cities in space and in the sea. Heck, the Islamofascists want to go back to the Middle Ages, don't they? Let's stop doing business with them, and confine them to a few Moslem holy places like Mecca, so they can have their wish.


Support this site!

© Copyright 2016 Charles Kimball




Return to Chapter 8

Remember to check out the rest of the content on this site.




Visitors: